![]() |
You are viewing Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
![]() | |
|
So here's me trying to move beyond my book-binge and lay it all out so that I can get back to living my life. a review / analysis of Martha Wells' Fall of Ile-Rien trilogy. I will mention that these books got me through what would have otherwise been a very boring and cold blackout of electrical service during a severe snowstorm that took down trees and power lines all over my city, and in fact the last book has wax spilled on some of the pages from the ridiculous little tealight candle I was trying to read by. I had an unprecedented chance to concentrate on these books, and reread, and I will always remember those couple of days fondly. That aside, now I'm going to talk about why.
Rien is sort of vaguely French-ish, and the time period is sort of early twentieth century ish. Ish. Telephones, automobiles with starter cranks, blackout curtains, and luxury trans-oceanic liners with steam engines. And oh, sorcerers are everywhere, and there's a whole university dedicated to them, and magic is just a part of everyday life although most people have only passing understanding of how it works. The other main setting, the Syrnai, is kind of Mediterranean-ish, sort of vaguely Minoan (as in the great Iron Age [?] civilization of Crete contemporary with the Mycenaens) actually: steel swords, olive oil lamps, and rowed galleys are the height of their modest technology. But no time is wasted on explanation; things simply happen, and they are well enough described (and consistently so) that it is obvious and no explanation is needed. An example: The entry hall was dark except for a single electric bulb burning in the converted gas fixture above the sweep of the stairs. The light fell on yellowed plaster walls and rich old wood and a blue-and-gold patterned carpet on polished stone tile. Coldcourt was aptly named and Tremaine's bare feet were half frozen by the time she made it to the front door. She had let the housekeeper have the night off and now she regretted it, but she had had no idea it would take this long to arrange things. At this rate she wouldn't be dead until next week. The characters likewise are immediate and individual, entirely free from bullshit. Characters' individual natures are immediately obvious, revealed with an economy of narrative that entwines exposition with storytelling so that the story never bogs down. "Ready?" Giliead asked, shaking his braids back and awkwardly maneuvering the pack's strap over his head and shoulder. He was nearly a head taller than Ilias and the confined space was almost too small for him. The point of view shifts in sections, rotating among several main characters and a few minor ones. This presents an ideal opportunity to make clear certain things about the appearance of various characters, which my choice of a tight POV in the novel I'm just finishing now didn't allow me. I can't stand it when a character stands and stares into a mirror just so the author can tell you what he/she looks like. And so there are only a few times in the book when the reader gets an idea of what my character looks like. Wells handles things much better, and less clumsily: I can see her characters clearly, but never have to digest large chunks of description. She avoids cliches here just as in everything else. There is one mirror-gazing moment, which is very typically Wellsish in what it reveals: Tremaine, in book 2, p. 47 or so. She leaned on the sink, looking into the mirror. Her mousy brown hair was getting shaggy and she pulled it back for an unobstructed view of her face. No, still don't recognize that person, she thought, resigned. Especially now, when she should be pale from the Vienne winter. Whoever that was in the mirror, her cheeks had a sprinkle of freckles and red patches from riding under this world's summer sun, as well as a nice patchwork of greenish yellow bruises. Giving up the unproductive self-scrutiny, she went back out into the main room. More instructive are the passages wherein Wells uses the reactions of third characters to give the POV character a chance to reflect on what the character in question looks like. In book 2, page 29ish, Tremaine answers the door with Ilias at her side and speaks to a new character, and the reader is given a far more objective picture of Ilias's appearance: throughout the first book, Tremaine quietly admires him, but this gives a much more compelling idea of why: Tremaine glared at him, then opened the door. That little scene serves at least three purposes. It highlights Tremaine's half-unconscious response to the character of Ilias [via her concealed jealousy of another woman's flirting], illuminates the reasons she has a guilty conscience [giving a sense of perspective about how her actions would be perceived by her peers] and the fact that she's far more ruthless yet human than she lets on, and also it sets up for another scene where Ilias [who, incidentally, has a facial tattoo that to his own people plainly illustrates that he has violated a taboo and thus is a non-person] tries to puzzle out his own motivations (book 2, p. 33-34): "I know you weren't there long, but did they seem the kind of people we could ally with?" Another very interesting and well-done aspect was the understated emotional content. Given that this deals with a world war on a grand scale (in fact more than one world), there is a lot of high drama-- husbands killed, innocents slaughtered, cities destroyed, civilizations driven toward extinction; traitors and self-sacrificing martyrs; many bittersweet final partings and highly-wrought emotional moments interspersed with frantic action. There are long-lost relatives and back-from-the-dead and mortal wounds and the such. And lots of standoffs with guns pointed at heads and such (including one poor young female character who has a gun held to her head to induce others to surrender twice within one book alone: her response is a resigned, "Not again"). She found the idea of expecting him to wait at her bedside like some character from a bad romantic novel hilarious, or possibly humiliating, or possibly both, but what if he didn't? What if he had intentionally stayed away to avoid giving her the wrong idea? What was the wrong idea? and, also book 3 (i'm avoiding spoilers by not mentioning names), p. 302: It had occurred to her why she had avoided every opportunity to talk to [him]. I can't say it. I can't say it like I'm supposed to. All the ridiculously emotional phrases of love. She remembered the last play she had seen before the war had closed the theaters, a romantic drama with people draping themselves langorously on couches and saying things like [...] You're the only one in my life and you fill it completely. She couldn't imagine how drunk she would have to be to say something like that> Whenever she had tried to write a romance in her plays, the audience could never tell if the characters were in love or not. She clapped a hand to her forehead in despair. Killing [rival] seemed like the best solution. Yes, for a crazy person, she thought in disgust. We were trying to give that up, remember? Interestingly, in Wells's livejournal, she mentions receiving criticisms of this particular character in reviews of the book, saying she is not emotional enough. I almost agreed: in a very emotional part near the end I did feel that she came across as slightly too flat, and it reduced some of the impact of the scene. It was mild; I liked how her shock made her reaction very straightforward but understated, but, not to be spoilery, I'll just say there was an embrace that should have been a kiss. But throughout the rest of the book, I found the emotional tone absolutely perfect: it vibrated beneath the surface with a restrained tension that made the entire thing much more absorbing. book 2 p. 339 If this bit of blackmail with Dubos didn't work... She hoped that maybe she would only have to kill him. She found, amazingly enough, that she didn't want to kill anybody. She propped her chin on her hand, looking at Ilias. "So you'd throw someone off this thing if I asked you to?" I might mention a couple of my kinks that it hits pretty hard, as well. I love how it is so feminist that it is beyond feminist: the Rienish society is roughly equivalent to ours in that women are nominally equal but minor relics of a patriarchial society cling on, such as taking the man's last name at marriage and not always being taken seriously as, for example, a soldier if you're female. It's a fairly enlightened society, but understatedly so. Whereas the Syprians are overtly matriarchial: a man has no rights on his own, and cannot own property. This is interesting in how it feminizes several characters who would otherwise be very manly: Ilias, for example, is a macho killing machine but is inwardly upset that his facial tattoo has rendered him worthless as a potential mate, depriving his family of the dowry that they would have been paid for him. Another kink is the sensitive barbarians. The Syprians are very emotional, with lots of hugging and crying and wrestling matches and kissing strangers on the mouth and so on. I can't explain it, but it's hot. Really hot. *fans self* I am sure that there must be Giliead/Ilias slash, and it's not helped by the fact that at one point Ilias wants them both to marry the same woman. (As polygamy is allowed, or polyandry to be correct: a man can only have one wife, but a woman can have as many husbands as she can afford.) You know, I don't even have to write fic about that. I'll just sit here a minute. And the action. Her previous novel, The Element of Fire (full text of novel available online), is called "swashbuckling" a lot. This one likewise has pretty much nonstop action. It's all clearly-described, and believable. People don't miraculously all know kung-fu or anything, it's just that two characters have always made their living killing bad guys so they're good at it, and various others demonstrate their proficiency in believable ways, and react to it afterward in a consistent manner. The plot, and structure, and the way the action tied together: thoroughly coherent, well-structured. There were, to use a metaphor, a lot of balls in the air, but the juggler managed to catch them all at the end. It was almost, almost too much, almost too many characters (a couple of times similar names bamboozled me-- Herias and Halian; Tremaine and Tiamarc) but if you were actually paying any attention whatsoever, the characters were so distinctly drawn that there was no reason to be confused. I did have to reread to catch up on quite how the whole ending part fit together with the issues raised in the beginning. But it was beautifully plotted, and paced perfectly. The magic: I wish Harry Potter was a bit more like this, in that the magic always serves more of a purpose than doing things that regular people have invented machines to do. (In fact there's an amusing dichotomy between things the Iron Age 'barbarians' think are magic versus the things that actually are magic.) The magic is well-integrated with the rest of the world, and it is always perfectly sensible for it to do what it does. There were a few things I didn't like. The ending, where I wanted more emotion from the one character: that was not as bad for me as it undoubtedly was for the negative reviewers. There were a few places where things fit together almost too smoothly, and if you were distracted enough to be thinking that way, the coincidences were too convenient. But there was nothing that should have been impossible, and so nothing I could fault. I wouldn't change a thing, but it did give me something to ponder when it was too dark to read. The thing is, it's either have everything fit together that tightly, or waste the reader's time with red herrings; all told, I'd rather have things be seamless than be trying to pick out what parts are wasting my time. Yeah, that's all I can come up with to say against it. I should give up on that. I should sum up, as I've been going on too long, but this is me trying to work through the fog I mentioned in the last post. This is as much organization as I can muster just now. So I will sum up by saying that these books worked for very good reasons and I can recommend them to others by those reasons. Down-to-earth, bullshit-free fantasy, with hunky sensitive killing machines. Where to read more: The Fall of Ile-Rien: Don't let this series go out of print like Element of Fire did. Buy them now. Book 3 will be out in paperback soon, but I might mention that the hardbacks are very attractive. You can also buy signed hardbacks from the author for not very much money through her website, I believe. Now I really have to start thrashing my way back to the real world. Bah. |
|
Previous Entry · Leave a comment · Add to Memories · Tell a Friend · Next Entry | |
There was a great Gilead & Ilias story in last year's yuletide... ::rummages through interwebs:: Ah! Here it is: Do a lot of people write Ile-Rien fanfic? I admit that I have felt the occasional itch over the last couple of days, but I should also admit that I've never actually written any fanfic besides LotR and I would feel a little strange writing in a fandom where the creator is not only a live but active. Yee, what a strange boundary issue that would be. And yet, the smut really asks for it. That scene where Ilias bites Tremaine's knuckle! And then-- nothing! GUH. I obviously have been reading too many romances and, er, slash fanfic. It's a darn good sight I haven't been in the YA section of the library lately; my head would probably explode. The Inter-Nets have spoiled me so. Hey, thanks for the great review. :) My policy on is here and it's basically that I can't say I'll look at it, but if people want to do it, go for it. I take it as a huge compliment. |
Hey, that's a really wonderful review/discussion. Wow. And then there's the 'yay, someone else likes the things I like best' bit. Knuckle-biting! Polyandry! Ruthless women! (I also love that you picked that line about the hair. That is such a character-revealing moment, too. Hee.) And: The Syprians are very emotional, with lots of hugging and crying and wrestling matches and kissing strangers on the mouth and so on. I can't explain it, but it's hot. Oh, yes indeedy. Though, do feel free to elaborate further. *cough* Sadly, AFAIK the story linked above (which I admire very much) is the only Ile-Rien fic in existence. However, > the only Ile-Rien fic in existence No! God, now I have no choice. ... And I was giving up fanfic for the rest of the year. Bah. So much for that. |
I followed the link from One of the things I really enjoyed about the trilogy was the way the writing really gave me the feeling of the best fanfiction, and I think part of that was due to the fact that Wells didn't overuse exposition, didn't hit us over the head with the worldbuilding and character building. We were almost assumed to either be familiar with the setting and characters or be smart enough to extrapolate them from the details she gave that advanced the plot, which felt very...ficcish, if you will, to me. The polyandry bit in particular pressed my "oh yay!" button in the same way fic does, and oh, I would love to go into more detail about that but I don't think I can without delving into spoiler territory. My one pet peeve is that I thought Wells overused the phrase, "clapped a hand to her forehead in [insert emotion here]." Multiple characters did this, and so often that it left me shaking my head. It's not a terribly common motion, I don't think, and was used repetitively enough that it began to seem more like a writer tic than something three characters from two different cultures would choose to do to express dismay, panic, disgust, or what have you. > the feeling of the best fanfiction This is probably going to sound crazy when I agree with you and elaborate, but I have a theory that fanfic, with its built-in audiences, actually is a better teacher of writing commercial fiction than anything else out there. The tenor of literature is changing, I think, as the audiences that read the most gradually become also audiences that write the most. I have been working on a novel for nearly fifteen years now, but it's only in the last three or so, when I discovered Internet fanfiction and realized that I could post something tonight and have fifteen comments on it before tomorrow, that I really learned how to write for an audience. Before that i was writing to please myself. The feeling fanfic has is very immediate-- it is very much focused on giving the reader an escape directly into the world in question. And yes, the atmosphere she captures with these fics is very similar to that, in that she doesn't waste her time with setting up the world because, as with fanfic, she knows you're already willing to commit yourself to it (otherwise the exercise is in vain). Just this expectation that where she takes you, you'll willingly go, makes it impossible not to be drawn in. What I thought was fascinating was that she really didn't explain Rien at all-- it was just assumed to pretty much be a rough equivalent to the first half of the 20th century in sort of France-ish, and the differences just didn't matter. I envy that style of worldbuilding very much-- it wasn't lazy, it was just a keen insight into the fact that, honestly, it doesn't matter. Unlike Tolkien, she doesn't assume you're reading this because you want to admire her worldbuilding skills. Which is all Wells bothers herself with, which means that her books are so much richer for being able to focus solely on what is important: the characters and the action. |